1. Who is the author?
Immanuel Kant born April 22 of 1724 in Konigsberg, East
Prussia. In 1746 he graduates the University of Konigsberg and served as
private tutor for various families in the neighborhood of Konigsberg. In 1755
he received his degree and was appointed Privatdozent at the University of
Konigsberg. For years he wrote many articles, essays and books. In 1770 he
finally obtained a regular professorship, the Chair of Logic and Metaphysics,
at Konigsberg. He died in 1804.
2. What is the author’s thesis? (Thesis question should be
answered in one sentence: this is a valuable skill to practice that will enable
you to process information efficiently and effectively).
Someone of the student wrote: “I can’t with Kant”.
Definitely this was a very complicated book; despite of that, my author’s
thesis is: “If a person is moved by his/her own thoughts, reason or morals;
then, that moral law is autonomous, not heteronomous, giving a sense of real
freedom”.
3. What is the author’s methodology and theory? (Method is
the way the author conducts research; theory s how the author explains the
research findings).
Method: He used philosophical method where he analyze,
critic, judge, and synthetizes the place of the reason in our action as human
beings. He philosophically analyzes and judges the moral of the human beings.
Also, Kant himself says he began analytically and turns synthetically from the
examination of the principle analyzed in the beginning.
Theory: Kant
established three sections: In the first section he mention any basic
principles bringing the reason to the grounds of the practical philosophy. In
the second section, he establishes a transition between the personal responsibilities
or duties to establish a moral law. And third, Kant explains why this moral law
becomes authoritative.
4. How did this reading further your self-understanding of
ethical issues and what do you take away from the book?
I grew up in a context where everyone has to do exactly
according to the customs, usages and manners of that place. So, I learned a
concept of the Christianity since the perspective of my church in Mexico. I
learned a group of moral laws and ethic where there are no place to my own
thoughts, personal perspectives or desires, only the manners of the people of
that place. I did all exactly as they wanted and was a wonderful boy, but
unhappy! The fact to do all our desires and thoughts with liberty, is to live
in a freedom where are autonomous, but responsible before people around us!
5. In light of the reading and class lecture, suggest a
specific act of justice you feel motivated to do.
Many people live jailed in themselves because they took
decision pressured by the people around them, as their parents or friends, and
not their own decisions and desires. For that reason, I will teach my son and
people around me to do exactly the things that they really desire because they
will make mistakes if they follow the desires of others and not their own
decisions. Maybe they will have mistakes or errors but they will enjoy the life
and learn to do it better!
I agree that a person has to act according to their good
will and volition, duty or maxim as Kant named it (4:403). This maxim could
become a universal law, if it is giving the happiness that the person has been
looking for. Also I agree that “everything in nature works in accordance with
laws” (4:413), that gives the Kant’s position the heteronomous required as
morals because we are all part of a whole. This position has an upside because
we are all part of a whole, and as part of the whole we have to respect each
other around us. Also, this position has falls, because we cannot live according to the desires, perspectives, or laws of others,
if that is not what we really want
and makes us happy.
The Kantian Categorical Imperative is different than a moral
relativism that has no set rules and standards, because the Kantian position,
despite is not based in universal defined laws but in experiences, is empirical
because its purpose is the happiness of people but it is attained by certain
conduct or commands of morality. So, in
the Kant position, people remains available to pursue their own happiness, but respecting others. In this
umbrella, they are able to create their own rules but respecting others around
them.
Talking about the question how the culture: what role does
culture play in determining the Categorical Imperative and what tensions does
it create? My own life is an example of that: I grew up in a context where
everyone has to do exactly according to the customs, usages and manners of that
place. So, I learned a concept of the Christianity since the perspective of my
church in Mexico. I learned a group of moral laws and ethic where there are no
place to my own thoughts, personal perspectives or desires, only the manners of
the people of that place. I did all exactly as they wanted and was a wonderful
boy, but unhappy! The fact to do all our desires and thoughts with liberty, is
to live in a freedom where are autonomous, but responsible before people around
us! Now that I live here in the United States I have a different perspective
than when I was in Mexico, I am not any more the same! So, I think that if Kant
had traveled and known other places, his perspective had been very
different!
Clyde first of all, thanks for your comments. All the time I
like your comments because you are showing your heart in all that you say or
comment here in classes or online posting. Also I need to recognize I have
troubles as you reading Kant, any times I have asked me why philosophers or
theologians write in that way, and in the same time began to think how I write
about theology in Spanish! Then I understand that any people have problems
understanding my theology, because I wrote my theology in theological terms.
So, trying to understand Kant’s perspective about morals, I perceived that
happiness is the reason of our actions, or as Kant called duty. And as you
said, those duties are our better motivator, but all the time we will have
outcomes and pressures from other people or circumstances, or as Kant called
heteronomous! Much times that heteronomous defeat the autonomy of our lives or
many of us deny that freedom and we are defeated by the external pressure and
we finish being unhappy! I agree wit you when you say that the most important
in this life is to be autonomy! God bless you my friend and be happy!
